An Interview with Anna van der Ploeg
We can learn so much from looking at art from other cultures so every month I interview artists worldwide as it strengthens our design practice. After recently discovering the work of Anna from Cape Town, I was engrossed in her bold and vibrant work. Looking at the painting that I recently bought from her this autumn takes me somewhere else completely which is much needed today! Read on to find out what inspires and influences Anna to create her work.
Anna grew up in diverse, lively Cape Town where she did a BFA at the Michaelis School of Fine Art. Her professional practice is far-reaching; she works primarily in painting, printmaking, sculpture and more. Her works are kept in private collections and institutions worldwide, among which the South African National Art Bank.
Tell us about your work
It’s all about relationships, the subtle actions they are shaped by, and the way interactions are perceived differently by each person or thing involved. Sometimes it’s about the relationship of an internal self to the external landscape; other times it is captivated by how our two internals are vastly different while experiencing the same external. Often it is an attempt to understand how power and inequality function, how they diffuse into seemingly insidious scenarios. Movement, and capturing a moment in a state of change, is one tool I use to explore this. As an intellectual framework and physical practice, I have found beekeeping to be a stimulating and sustaining well of ideas and parallels. I trained as a printmaker, but have recently been working mainly in oils, ink, and carved, painted woodblocks.
What’s South Africa like?
There are a lot of talented people with fresh vision and energy in South Africa, and perspective hard-won through an active engagement with inequality. People are warm, sharply funny, and the country has shaped us by a history that is sometimes all too present. I think we take pleasure, and dance well.
What influences you and how has your practice evolved?
Beekeeping, humour, power relations, poetry, contradictions, embodiment and physical interaction, symbolism and perceived synchronicities. My practice has become more urgent, larger, sharper. I suppose much of the motivation to do a masters degree is to dig into my practice in an academic environment, and evolve it in a considered and deliberate way.
How is Belgium life treating you?
Right now I can probably tell you more about online seminars and the seagulls walking over my skylight than anything in particular to Belgium, per se. I do think it’s a useful thing to go through, being uprooted, to view your work and ideas against a new background, in a different context, and to be anonymous. Obviously I’m not getting as much out of that experience as one would normally hope for right now - it’s far from ideal - but neither is anyone else, out of pandemic-life, for that matter. I’m still in a very fortunate position, considering the circumstances. We’re getting something else, something much weirder and out of control.
My classes are filled with students from different disciplines - music, fashion, drama, social design - rather than only ‘fine arts’ students, making for very stimulating discussions. For example, the performance cellist and lute-maker had different perspectives on the questions of what public art means to their disciplines, than the sculptors. Despite zoom and distance, these conversations go on. I’m looking forward to being able to move around, go to museums, see all the art-related things going on, and meet other artists.
We’re living in interesting times. Does this effect your work at all?
The work I’ve made in the last six months was made under weird conditions. I was experiencing the same stress and uncertainty as everyone else, and trying to be resourceful, ‘make a plan’, continue on with life and work somehow within new parameters. I definitely think this shows in my work, in representations of laundry in a tumultuous wind, or people and some point of tension. I also think it’s made the images of landscapes more vast and enveloping.
Why do you choose the materials you do?
For painting, I choose materials based on a very specific balance of slippery/toothy, it’s both an idiosyncratic and boring methodology. Wood is perhaps more interesting in terms of its materiality, and being variable wherever you go. Bending ply I came to by chance having worked with ply while carving woodblocks for printing in Japan and then struggling to find wood of comparable quality in Cape Town. It is quite unique.
Which artists do you admire and why?
Marisol Escobar, Martin Puryear, Laura Aguilar and Isamu Noguchi for making physical things that speak to our world. Marlene Dumas, Lynette Yiadom-Boakye, Sam Nthlengethwa, and Diane Victor for their use of figuartion and concern with people.
Artisans and craftworkers of all kinds for working with communal knowledge, in a less individualistic way. I can appreciate many different approaches to art but I suppose the undercurrent of the people I admire, the people who I would most like to follow are those who feel some sense of social responsibility and respond through their work.
I respond most deeply to work that has the conscience and courage to do this, and I think that achieving a lightness or playfulness while also carrying that weight is then a greater achievement. I very much miss going to exhibitions and seeing art in real life.
Anna is currently working on a video project with an artist from Berlin under the collaborative EveryMutter. She’s also undertaking a masters at KASK Royal Conservatorium in Gent, Belgium, where she’s studying fine arts.
Follow Anna, see more of her work and contact her here.